cimorene: (helen kane)Cimorene ([personal profile] cimorene) wrote,
@ 2009-02-13 11:41 am UTC
  • Previous Entry
  • Add to Memories
  • Tell someone about this!
  • Next Entry
Entry tags:feminism, gay, links, politics, tv
Rolling Stone Interview with Joss Whedon: Revolt of a TV Genius (or: Why I Don't Have High Hopes for Dollhouse) (Download the pdf scans at the link), via @paperandglue.

Beth Ditto makes a great voluptuous non-conformist cover model for the debut of Love magazine, and looks better naked IMO than your typical Barbie, but... WHY ARE THE NIPPLES GONE? Seriously, this is the real nipplegate: people being presented in photography without them. What?!

Yesterday's Daily Show was SO RIGHT about the economic crisis and the congressional hearings. (For a mainstream news take, have yesterday's Wall St CEOs berated by lawmakers @Reuters.)

Via [livejournal.com profile] hollsh, the Literal LOLs category at Cake Wrecks, the Bad-Cake Mocking Blog. (Example: the "2008 I want sprinkles" cake.)

Michelle Obama's Vogue cover & shoot. This might be the first time in my lifetime that Vogue has been relevant to society outside the fashion/media industries - certainly the first time in my memory.


(Read 3 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)

ext_30643: (Porn! \o/)


[identity profile] scrimschaw.livejournal.com
2009-02-13 05:26 pm UTC (link)
Maybe they're trying to make us think that she doesn't have breasts? Like, "Those are not boobs you see. Those are strategically-placed blobs of flesh that LOOK like breasts, but they cannot be, because they don't have nipples."

Or something.

(Reply to this)  (Thread from start)  (Parent



(Read 3 comments) - (Post a new comment)
(Flat) (Top-level comments only)