ext_6293 ([identity profile] cimness.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] cimorene 2003-08-29 05:54 am (UTC)

nope, didn't.

in the 'gay marriage through the ages page,' though, which didn't reference that book that i remember, it talked about matelotage possibly being used between two women or between larger groups. and one of the things i read (same one?) indicated that rather than a romantic gay union, matelotage was probably meant to deal with the dispersal of their property after death. the similarities to marriage--certainly the binding partnership--seem to carry across those explanations.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org