no, i'm totally with you on tezuryo porn - i mean, it's an interesting problem, and it can't just be regular, casual porn. i don't think that it's really impossible, but i realised last night as i was getting to the sex scene in tezuka's point of view that i can't see a first-time sex scene being graphic in his point of view ever. and i probably could never buy the word "cock" or anything similar at all, so that would maybe make the "porn" label a misnomer, but i do think if it were set in an established relationship it could probably still be nc-17. just... it would be tough.
aöslkdfjöa now i want to get on ym and talk to you about this instead of doing my cleaning.
AND ALSO ABOUT HOW THEY CONVEY BEING IN LOVE BY STARING. öalksfdöldask look at tezuka's stare of love in my icon and he's not even looking at ryoma, he's just THINKING about him. aöslkdfaöskldf. god.
um, but - i think it could go more graphic from ryoma's point of view (although i'm still not convinced about "cock". it's just too... yeah).
so this is why what i wrote ended up being completely made of metaphors and aja actually made me cut out the words "ribs" and "thighs" because they were too anatomically accurate (although i really had to insist on keeping "hips" and "back" for the sake of clarity).
no subject
aöslkdfjöa now i want to get on ym and talk to you about this instead of doing my cleaning.
AND ALSO ABOUT HOW THEY CONVEY BEING IN LOVE BY STARING. öalksfdöldask look at tezuka's stare of love in my icon and he's not even looking at ryoma, he's just THINKING about him. aöslkdfaöskldf. god.
um, but - i think it could go more graphic from ryoma's point of view (although i'm still not convinced about "cock". it's just too... yeah).
so this is why what i wrote ended up being completely made of metaphors and aja actually made me cut out the words "ribs" and "thighs" because they were too anatomically accurate (although i really had to insist on keeping "hips" and "back" for the sake of clarity).