ext_6293 ([identity profile] cimness.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] cimorene 2006-07-13 10:30 am (UTC)

i definitely agree with grace. there are isolated circumstances where epithets are unobjectionable and there are a narrower set of circumstances where it's a debatable stylistic choice (such as "his lover", provided the person in question IS his lover; or even, much as i despise it, occasionally things like "the blonde"; even if the pov character wouldn't think of them that way, there are people who like to jump pov in their narration, and if they want to do that as a rule there's nothing you can do). however, as a general rule pov jumping is bad because it takes you out of the story, and as grace points out, it's a stylistic choice that's widely regarded as bad.

and then, there's this: in the vast majority of epithet cases - all the ones mentioned above, for instance - it really is just a matter of bad writing. there will never be a time when sticking such a long descriptor as "the redheaded acrobatic tennis player with the permanent bandage as a facial accessory" or "the cashier of the novelty christmas store" or "the bandana-clad teen" into the middle of a sentence is acceptable. it wouldn't matter what the phrase was; it makes the sentence gratingly clunky.

Post a comment in response:

If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

If you are unable to use this captcha for any reason, please contact us by email at support@dreamwidth.org