Entry tags:
the poor taste of the unwashed masses
also. for those of you who, like me, have this syndrome whereby you think you're always right, and everyone who disagrees with you is probably wrong although you don't want to be too mean and unaccepting about it and of course other opinions are acceptable but it's just how could they think that. especially when it's not what you think?
uhm. so yes, have always been of the opinion that the vast majority of people are stupid. evidence the kind of books that get to be vastly popular, with, of course, the notable exception of harry potter--except that hp isn't even the best of its genre (british children's fantasy) out there, and it just figures the best wouldn't come close to it. right. but look at tom clancy, stephen king, danielle steele, that dude who wrote jurassic park, and the guy who writes all those exactlythesame!lawyer novels that are supposed to be dramatic. even within sff, look at mercedes lackey, marion zimmer bradley, anne mccaffrey, david weber. the list goes on.
pop music is obviously the exception here, because the only criterion for it isn't absolute quality of music/etc, but also includes catchiness, sparkliness, cool dance moves, appearance in eye makeup.
ahem. so. my point is that i shouldn't be surprised when the very slash stories that i find the most maudlin, insipid, predictable, mischaracterized repetitive bullshit ever garner pages of feedback and squishy gushing goodness from hordes of fans. why? well, evidently brain damage, or simple native lack of intelligence and good taste. so why am i surprised? but i always, always am.
naming no names of fics. hey, i'm probably not talking about any of the people who are reading this.
someone agree with me to make me feel better.
*pout*
uhm. so yes, have always been of the opinion that the vast majority of people are stupid. evidence the kind of books that get to be vastly popular, with, of course, the notable exception of harry potter--except that hp isn't even the best of its genre (british children's fantasy) out there, and it just figures the best wouldn't come close to it. right. but look at tom clancy, stephen king, danielle steele, that dude who wrote jurassic park, and the guy who writes all those exactlythesame!lawyer novels that are supposed to be dramatic. even within sff, look at mercedes lackey, marion zimmer bradley, anne mccaffrey, david weber. the list goes on.
pop music is obviously the exception here, because the only criterion for it isn't absolute quality of music/etc, but also includes catchiness, sparkliness, cool dance moves, appearance in eye makeup.
ahem. so. my point is that i shouldn't be surprised when the very slash stories that i find the most maudlin, insipid, predictable, mischaracterized repetitive bullshit ever garner pages of feedback and squishy gushing goodness from hordes of fans. why? well, evidently brain damage, or simple native lack of intelligence and good taste. so why am i surprised? but i always, always am.
naming no names of fics. hey, i'm probably not talking about any of the people who are reading this.
someone agree with me to make me feel better.
*pout*
no subject
*I have to say, because I always stick up for the hometown hero, that Stephen King is a much better writer than he's given credit for.
*I think I agree with you on the bad slash getting many a rec, but I can't completely agree as I don't know what fic(s) you're talking about. Am deply intrigued, though.
*Chris and Justin? Desperately, madly, wonderfully inlove.
Agreed in full
(Anonymous) 2002-02-25 08:43 am (UTC)(link)At any rate, mediocrity gets the lion's share of praise-- partly because many people are too lazy to try to understand more involved or deeper works, Partly because many people may be too dumb to fully appreciate them, and partly because most people, even the smarter ones, are jealous of others' intellects.
In other words, I think a lot of people praise the mediocre or bad fics simply because they don't have to be jealous of the minds that created them, and because they don't have to bear the burden of having *their* minds challenged or bettered by reading them.
This happens to such an extent in fandom that I've known a few authors who actually worry *when they get* a lot of praise, for fear that it means they're becoming mediocre, or for fear that it means the story they just put out there wasn't as good as their usual level.
*sigh*
I know I'm not right as often as I'd like to think I am, and I know that I'm occasionally far too short and nasty with people when I think they're being stupid... but Jesus. Sometimes you just want to shake the writers and scream, "TRY, FOR GOD'S SAKE!" Or in the case of readers, "HELLO? FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, DISCRIMINATE A LITTLE!"
This is also why good shows get cancelled in a year or two and crappy ones linger for aeons, IMNSHO.
--A Fellow Author
no subject
nope. about stephen king. no way.
just the subject matter, writing aside, excludes it from the possibility of literary value.
no subject
Re: Agreed in full
maybe just quantity of praise, not effusivity thereof? *hopeful look*
no subject
no subject
<--always loves new acronyms. snits. must remember this.
Re: Agreed in full
(Anonymous) 2002-02-25 09:04 am (UTC)(link)>_<
--Your Anonymous Author. I'm not bitter about this! Really!
...okay, so I'm bitter. :-P
Re:
And hey, I'm not getting into a Stephen King arguement here. But. "Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption". Different subject matter. And that's that. He's a really great guy and I like some of his stuff, so I tend to stick up for him. To each his own and all that.
no subject
Re: Agreed in full
no subject
i should learn to be happy that people without taste don't like my fic, yes?
no subject
Haha, that's life isn't it
Re: Haha, that's life isn't it
i don't really know what you're talking about, having no familiarity with either game, but i'm sure you're right. the same principles apply everywhere.
no subject
(ok, i still haven't looked at the nsync stuff yet but i don't want to add to the list of people saying "i like this but not nsync" which i am afraid would happen if i read them. so at least by not reading them this can't happen...)
i love your writing enough for at least 20 people. so if you like i could get myself 19 new email addresses and write feedback in 20 different ways?
no subject
no subject
I write TONS of maudlin, predictable, mischaracterized repetitive bullshit! Where's my feedback? ::looks pointedly at the unwashed masses::
Some people get all the luck.
[but. er. yes. I agree with you. It's frightening and frustrating and yes. Just on principle. It drives me nuts when crap TV gets good ratings too. People should not support crap! We're dumbing down our culture! blah, blah, blah...]
no subject
new icon? i like it!
no subject
but look, all you have to do re: nsync is not *mention* in your feedback that you don't like them. that's all i'm asking.
but fine, don't read them. :p
Re:
ok, i will read them. but ahahahah not on the day when i should have left the house to catch the train 5 minutes ago but instead am not yet dressed and using the computer - aarghhhhhh!
no subject
no subject
but i will say i'm astonished you like him.
no subject
14-yr-old girl behavior is typical of maudlin bad stories. have you noticed this?
no subject
My ability to be snide would be much improved if I didn't have an internal beta.
no subject
::shrugs:: I first read "It" when I was in sixth grade and it took me a month. *giggles* I was so in love with that book, and I think it influenced me some. I know that "Firestarter" did. I'm, like, obsessed with that scarred!creepy!Native American guy of whose name I don't remember. He was oddly seductive and fascinating. That book had a lot of quiet horror. Those poor burned chickens! and. oh fuck. ::shudders:: the tranquilizer in her throat and the snow..... ::shudders:: I have so many images in my head from that book. My copy of it is worn thin -- probobly read it about 11 times.
I can't stand anything he's written for a long time, and think it's pretty much all crap, but some of the old skool books I love. I grew up reading him -- all through sixth grade and junior high and ninth grade.
but. er. yes. Pretty much my favorite genre is horror. I don't read much of anything else, other than homoerotic literature and then a few quirky authors like Vonnegut and Oscar Wilde and Kundera. hehehe...
<- dork
no subject
...anyway, i've never read anything like the entirety of a stephen king book, just snippets of... it and pet cemetery, i think, in... 3rd or 4th grade? and much raving from an eccentric friend, and i remained singularly unimpressed.
i read fantasy and science fiction growing up (mostly during school, like, while the teacher was talking. this was never injurious until 8th grade or so, except in 4th when my teacher tried to confiscate my book in math. i mean honestly--negative numbers. who needs to pay attention to know how to do THAT?)
no subject
and i would say they have universally bad taste and can't write well partly because they read nothing worthwhile, but i think it's much more complicated than that. because look at stunningly good writers like sil and wax reading crap like stephen king, and people who can't write anything at all liking good literature (ie, my parents).
no subject
no subject
Have I babbled at you yet about the wonderfulness of Tennessee and how it is all Your Fault that I'm reading RPS at all? I've lost track of who I've feedbacked, and I know I haven't sent the long exegesis it deserves.
no subject
no subject
and you just come right out and admit this? *thinks* nope, there is no possible explanation except brain damage. poor sil! your brain is damaged and i never knew it! in other news, people need to stop disagreeing with me. grrrr.
no subject
hmmmmmmm... I wonder if we both just have major father issues. ahahahahahahaha! Daddy issues! ahahahaha!
in other news, people need to stop disagreeing with me. grrrr.
awwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.... *petpetpetpet*
no subject
i admit of a possibility that it is taste and not brain damage.