I'm not sure I'd agree with 'actually bad' as a value judgment, but in the context of her argument, I think I agree with it. As a being who has knowingly done things that were actually bad in the past and who is, as the post says, good at his job, that is.

*because then you get into debating good, bad, evil, the degrees of them and the space in between, which is coming close to the core messages and themes