no no that's my whole point. the point of my post is that the layout of the picture is inescapably suggestive, of CROTCH at least.
your mind does NOT have to be in the gutter to call a picture focused on a crotch suggestive. the crotch is the clear center of the picture--see above. CROTCH-->SEX is not a big leap. there's no exhaustive proof of that above, but i guess if you can't agree with that you just don't live in the same reality i live in.
aja simply thinks a suggestive, crotch-centric picture of a fourteen-year-old [pubescent] boy is childsploitation. i don't think your mind has to be in the gutter to think that any more than your average slasher's mind--i'd say you have to be a little uptight, or have some big age-hangups.
also: you mean... like... loose enough to see up the leg-holes? cause fitted pants and jeans are generally considered more suggestive than loose ones.
no subject
your mind does NOT have to be in the gutter to call a picture focused on a crotch suggestive. the crotch is the clear center of the picture--see above. CROTCH-->SEX is not a big leap. there's no exhaustive proof of that above, but i guess if you can't agree with that you just don't live in the same reality i live in.
aja simply thinks a suggestive, crotch-centric picture of a fourteen-year-old [pubescent] boy is childsploitation. i don't think your mind has to be in the gutter to think that any more than your average slasher's mind--i'd say you have to be a little uptight, or have some big age-hangups.
also: you mean... like... loose enough to see up the leg-holes? cause fitted pants and jeans are generally considered more suggestive than loose ones.