cimorene: cartoony drawing of a woman's head in profile giving dubious side-eye (working)
Cimorene ([personal profile] cimorene) wrote2003-04-20 01:30 pm

to boldy go where no preschool toy has gone before

look what i got for easter! kirk and spock!

it's lego!love! only not really, because of course these are't lego people, they only look like them.




nice lego spirk ;-)

[identity profile] dreamplum.livejournal.com 2003-04-20 01:47 pm (UTC)(link)
Hey Cim! Remember me? Probably not. We chatted on AIM over last summer at some point. Anyway, hi, it's Farfalla from the world of K/S. I was wondering if you had any PG13 or lower fic/pics that you wouldn't mind me posting on the All-Ages Kirk/Spock Archive that I've set up. And I'd also like the link to your fic site, for my links page... I seem to have continually forgotten to add it! ~*sorry*~

http://www.geocities.com/kirkandspockinlove
if you haven't seen it already. We've got over 20 people represented there so far, and it keeps on healthily growing :-D

Happy Easter, and congrats on your cute widdle baby jimmie&pockie dolls! ;-)

~Farfalla the Butterfly-Kitten
http://www.cosmicduckling.com

Re: nice lego spirk ;-)

[identity profile] cimness.livejournal.com 2003-04-20 01:57 pm (UTC)(link)
i think saccharine is pg--there's mention of dolls made out of candy having sex (^.^) but that's about it... 'silence' has no graphic sex in it (i don't think) but is very sexually-oriented, so you'd have to judge. and the one that my beta currently has custody of doesn't have any either.

Re: nice lego spirk ;-)

[identity profile] dreamplum.livejournal.com 2003-04-20 03:15 pm (UTC)(link)
Thanks for the permission, and I'll read those fics and judge as soon as you give me the url *lol.... i don't have it... whoops!*

~Farf

Re: nice lego spirk ;-)

[identity profile] cimness.livejournal.com 2003-04-20 03:21 pm (UTC)(link)
www.rightthisway.net/cimorene/trek/main.html

Re: nice lego spirk ;-)

[identity profile] dreamplum.livejournal.com 2003-04-20 03:33 pm (UTC)(link)
'Saccharine' isn't K/S; although I do believe there should be an all-inclusive non-erotic slash archive, I only have the obsessive drive enough for one pairing *g*. As for 'Silence', wow, yeah, it's REALLY sexy. I love it!! But I don't think it can go on the page... I think I may link to it from my recs site, though.

Are you working on anything new? Maybe keep AAK/SA in mind if you get bored and start a new fic... ;-)

~Farfalla
Thank you!

Re: nice lego spirk ;-)

[identity profile] cimness.livejournal.com 2003-04-20 03:46 pm (UTC)(link)
well, actually, it is; it's just not labelled as such because it's in the background, and sort of gently implied (much like in the tv show itself!). as i mentioned, my beta has a new fic right now. i'm working on another, but i'm determined it's going to have a sex scene.

Re: nice lego spirk ;-)

[identity profile] dreamplum.livejournal.com 2003-04-20 08:50 pm (UTC)(link)
Can't wait to see what your new thing that's currently in beta is like... :-) So, if it's PG (if I understand you correctly), may I have it? :-D

Thanks for putting up with me *g*
~Farfalla

Re: nice lego spirk ;-)

[identity profile] cimness.livejournal.com 2003-04-20 09:18 pm (UTC)(link)
yeah, it's pg, only a kiss; children would have a hell of a time following the actual plot, though not the occurences themselves. you can link to anything you like on my site. no need to ask permission.

Re: nice lego spirk ;-)

[identity profile] dreamplum.livejournal.com 2003-04-20 09:26 pm (UTC)(link)
It might be too complicated for children, but to tell you the truth I didn't really make the page "for kids" per se; actually, I thought there should be a place where everyone could enjoy Kirk and Spock nuzzling together, even those people who aren't necessarily comfortable with reading graphic sex. Hell, there are all-ages *het* pages... I just didn't like what it implied if every single page with gay romance was adults-only. :-P

You mentioned links. Well, actually, the policy is to archive the piece instead of linking; I'll use your exact HTML file or do whatever you want with it, but I don't have any external links because I wanted people to feel comfortable clicking on anything they saw without having to be concerned that something they didn't want to see would pop up. I know your site is relatively safe, but some people have explicit illustrations decorating their menu pages, and I don't want to have to start 'grading' external pages. So... if archiving isn't okay with you, let me know. But thanks for saying I could take whatever! That's half the reason I ask permission so much. (The other half is that some of our artists/authors aren't K/S'ers, and I wanted to make it clear to anyone seeing the site and recognizing them as such would know that they were ok with their works being used in this way.)

blueberrysnail @ yahoo . com if you are getting tired of replying on LJ, hehe ;-)

~Farfalla

Re: nice lego spirk ;-)

[identity profile] cimness.livejournal.com 2003-04-20 09:33 pm (UTC)(link)
nah, it's faster this way--i'll have to think about it; i don't generally hold with being archived off-site, with the exception of fandom-wide archives, official ones and whatnot. i don't require a link to my index page. linking directly to the stories would be the same if you used my identical html.

Re: nice lego spirk ;-)

[identity profile] dreamplum.livejournal.com 2003-04-20 09:37 pm (UTC)(link)
It's ok with me if you'd rather not, of course; it's just my self-inflicted job to comb the web for PG fic and ask everybody ;-) and I still will link to Silence from my recs page on my personal K/S site.

I'm hoping this archive will be "official", actually... after all, someone has to personally sit down and make those official archive sites, right? Especially considering they're not sponsored by the company that actually owns the rights... Ha! Can you imagine that?? ;-)

~Farf

Re: nice lego spirk ;-)

[identity profile] cimness.livejournal.com 2003-04-21 06:07 am (UTC)(link)
well, since it's not fandom- or pairing-inclusive and not affiliated with the list, i think it loses out on the 'official' front.