my kind of canon
18 Jul 2005 05:21 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
cimorenei complain that the proper wanking scene can't come into being without more extensive high resolution images of rodney's neck and within a couple of minutes, ![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
kaneko (clearly the queen of google, beating even my better half) comes up with this. oh, god, where to start? eyelashes--the true length finally revealed! the texture of his neck? the little crease going right through the adam's apple? his cute little nose? mobile mouth1? his little face creases? the fact that scowling actually has left a permanent crease right between his eyebrows? no, i don't know, look for yourself. ahhhhhhh. fandom! i love fandom.
1. i can't remember where i got the phrase 'mobile mouth' anymore, but i really love it. oh, hm, was it the vorkosigan novels perhaps?
kaneko (clearly the queen of google, beating even my better half) comes up with this. oh, god, where to start? eyelashes--the true length finally revealed! the texture of his neck? the little crease going right through the adam's apple? his cute little nose? mobile mouth1? his little face creases? the fact that scowling actually has left a permanent crease right between his eyebrows? no, i don't know, look for yourself. ahhhhhhh. fandom! i love fandom.1. i can't remember where i got the phrase 'mobile mouth' anymore, but i really love it. oh, hm, was it the vorkosigan novels perhaps?
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 18 Jul 2005 02:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18 Jul 2005 03:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18 Jul 2005 04:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18 Jul 2005 07:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18 Jul 2005 07:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18 Jul 2005 07:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18 Jul 2005 07:27 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18 Jul 2005 07:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18 Jul 2005 07:29 pm (UTC)they're a bit on the pale/grey side of cornflowery. but they're close to cornflower.
i have to say gary's are better, though. colour-wise.
(no subject)
Date: 18 Jul 2005 07:47 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18 Jul 2005 07:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 18 Jul 2005 08:15 pm (UTC)therefore, i'm afraid you're going to have to supply me with pictorial evidence. *grin*
(no subject)
Date: 18 Jul 2005 08:36 pm (UTC)okay, image-heavy
Date: 18 Jul 2005 08:49 pm (UTC)