plebefic headers: "omg you dirty pervert you can't dream of lollipops and candy canes?!"

1. Author's Notes: Okay I'm very excited about this, its my first KrAdam story SQUEE! I've always loved this pairing but was too scared to try writing cause there are much better writers out there, so I just pretty much lurked on the sidelines but then I had this amazingly hot dream in which Kris and Adam were, well never mind what they were doing lol. *blushes* After the initial feeling of "omg you dirty pervert you can't dream of lollipops and candy canes?!" wore off, I remembered other bits of the dream and decided to make it a fic, so here you go!



2. Summary: Jon's got an anonymous letter-writer on his hands. They won't tell him who they are, and their penmanship is getting worse by the letter.



3. Summary: Porn, hello



4. Summary: Brendon Urie, young, stubborn and innocent. Ryan Ross, intelligent, experienced and respected. Both sharing a prison cell, this could be interesting…



5. Disclaimer: I own Sho's body *gets stoned* Okay, I DON'T, HAPPY?

#5: aeslis

the gay marriage debate in Finland

In Finland, where civil partnerships exist but do not convey benefits equivalent to marriage, the question of legalizing gay marriage has been under debate for some little while and is on the agenda of the governing Center-Green coalition. The side debate concerns the state Evangelical Lutheran church of Finland, which currently has an anti-gay marriage stance, and whether such a law would require it to voluntarily relinquish its current right to perform legally binding marriage ceremonies. This tiny article appeared at the bottom of page 4 in today's HBL (Finland-Swedish newspaper):

One in three priests wants to wed gay couples

About one third of priests in the Evangelical Lutheran church in Finland could imagine themselves marrying gay couples, according to a survey done by Radio Dei. Female priests are more positive towards the idea than male priests.

More than half of respondents are unwilling to wed gay couples.

It's interesting because, while that "More than half are willing to stand up and declare themselves for legal inequality and lending themselves personally to suppressing your, yes, YOUR, Cim's, civil rights" - of course that's still upsetting, but given the tenor of debate and the way it is generally posed as a civil vs. religious question, I was definitely surprised that as many as a third of priests are actually for it.