Page Summary
sweetvalleyslut.livejournal.com - (no subject)
revulo.livejournal.com - (no subject)
stungunbilly.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cimness.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cimness.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cimness.livejournal.com - (no subject)
brownbetty - (no subject)
guinevere33.livejournal.com - (no subject)
anatsuno.livejournal.com - (no subject)
stungunbilly.livejournal.com - (no subject)
revulo.livejournal.com - (no subject)
vass - (no subject)
farwing.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cimness.livejournal.com - (no subject)
brownbetty - (no subject)
cimness.livejournal.com - (no subject)
anatsuno.livejournal.com - (no subject)
vass - (no subject)
schonste.livejournal.com - (no subject)
stungunbilly.livejournal.com - (no subject)
hollsh.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kyuuketsukirui.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ukcalico.livejournal.com - (no subject)
ukcalico.livejournal.com - (no subject)
merryish.livejournal.com - (no subject)
anatsuno.livejournal.com - (no subject)
msilverstar - (no subject)
stungunbilly.livejournal.com - (no subject)
copracat - (no subject)
telesilla.livejournal.com - (no subject)
acari.livejournal.com - (no subject)
stungunbilly.livejournal.com - (no subject)
kitsune13.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cimness.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cimness.livejournal.com - (no subject)
dunautremonde.livejournal.com - (no subject)
cimness.livejournal.com - (no subject)
someblazingstar.livejournal.com - (no subject)
Active Entries
- 1: Stores with rancid vibes
- 2: Or as much dignity as you can with a walrus mustache
- 3: Clearly I should only do Stuff to the fire while wearing leather gloves with long gauntlet cuffs
- 4: Talking about the weather...
- 5: I've read 61 detective novels this year so far. Lol.
- 6: Specifications of a Locked Room
- 7: A fascinating 1920s portrait of a seedy London nightclub
- 8: The thing about the adaptational changes made to The Seven Dials Mystery
- 9: at present you are a nuisance to your friends and a disgrace to your country's legislature
- 10: Lemony desserts lemonier?
Style Credit
- Style: Practically Dracula for Practicalitesque - Practicality (with tweaks) by
- Resources: Dracula Theme
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 04:20 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 04:23 pm (UTC)..."weeping"?
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 04:34 pm (UTC)But there was never even a moment of hesitation over "orbs". Always a winner in the "cheesiest possible description" category, especially if precious stones are involved.
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 04:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 04:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 04:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 05:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 05:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 05:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 05:42 pm (UTC)Though, maybe I'll come to regret even putting the idea out there...
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 05:56 pm (UTC)Which I regard as a VERY good thing.
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 05:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 05:58 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 05:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 06:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 06:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 06:14 pm (UTC)I also don't always mind reading 'entrance' though I like it in spare amounts, and prefer the full 'entrance to his body' version somehow.. I think my subjective impression is that if you're going to use that euphemism you better cop to it honestly and use it in full, instead of shortening it and trying to make me think of the use of that word there was perfectly normal and accurate when it's somewhat not, since euphemistic - I know, weird thought process.
Otoh, I would never myself *write* entrance - if I have, you can be sure I forced myself to and I must have had what felt like a good reason at the time - I can stand reading it but not writing it. How weird.
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 06:18 pm (UTC)(is reminded of the Yes Prime Minister episode where there's a state funeral for the former PM, and included the memorable moment when one ambassador (French? I can't remember) tells Humphrey that the former PM's problem was that he had a lot of this, *points to head*, a lot of this, *points to heart*, but not enough of this - and groped Humphrey.)
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 06:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 07:25 pm (UTC)I wonder if anyone has ever written a sex scene in which the anal aperture is described completely as a metaphorical gothic cathedral. It brings to mind horrible puns involving "gilt" and "inlaid".
Still better than "orbs", though.
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 08:18 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 08:42 pm (UTC)Yes to all of this. I don't think of hole as a euphemism because it's simply a shortening of asshole. Sometimes in context asshole just seems redundant or too long for the rhythm of the sentence. I use both all the time.
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 08:54 pm (UTC)Two further points:
1. Whilst obviously many are hilarious/revolting, I don't find there are actually *any* sexual terms that are particularly exciting - for me it's all about the picture being built and the, er, rhythms of the scene. Therefore the majority of the time I use the mildest, least descriptive terms (hot and hard, yes; red and angry, no; meaty pole, never) and I tend to use terms repetitively (eg I'd say cock every time, rather than alternating between cock, dick, erection, etc) because I think they become invisible1 more quickly.
On the hole/entrance/etc debate, when I feel it needs something more specific than 'inside him'... I ponder this for hours! I always used to err towards 'entrance to his body' because with the right pov focus that's exactly what it *is*; nowadays I'm in coarser fandoms *g* and so I'm starting to use 'hole' or 'asshole' from time to time. Or 'arsehole', if he's British.
Which brings me on to:
2. Having said all that about *my* preferences, it's really all about POV! So I will break any and all of my above-stated rules if the character is the sort to think about having a sex2 or a manhood or an orifice or whathaveyou (although possibly at that point I'd also fade-to-black, ew).
1 in the way that the very "said" is effectively invisible in most scenes
2For all I loathe "his sex" I still suspect that's how elves and Aragorn think of theirs.
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 08:55 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 09:15 pm (UTC)I was working on a story a while back in which I really wanted to write a little nipple-sucking in the sex scene, and yet found myself oddly reluctant to use the word "nipple". I suspect this is because I had said it to myself so many times, in trying to find an alternate, that the word itself had started to sound ridiculous, and every time I tried to write it, I started laughing. (It sounded even more hilarious in Sam Winchester's voice; try it!)
In the end I just :: kof :: sucked it up and used "nipple", because there simply IS no acceptable substitute. But the writing process for that scene pretty much obliterated my ability to ever re-read it... =)
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 09:18 pm (UTC)Funnily though, while you don't find any particular terms exciting, I must admit that while it's all about context for me (the piece itself will determine if I find something sexy or not), there are a few really set things that I will tend to always find sexy or always repulsive.
Sidenote: I'm happy to hear you write coarser stuff nows! And though it's not in my fandoms, I think I will HAVE TO check that out, omg. The hot like burning of Sabotage transferred to +x years of ex. + harsher descriptive language should do it for me just fine. *g*
Oh, and I think you're probably THE reason that I like "entrance to his body". :D
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 09:21 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 09:36 pm (UTC)Nipple is just a funny word, and attempts to get around that just remind you of the hilarity. It's a tragedy. I think one has to use tactical distraction to sneak it by the reader. We should just be grateful nobody tries to compare the "nubs" with gemstones. Pink quartz? Rubies? OMG. Fruit is bad enough.
[(It sounded even more hilarious in Sam Winchester's voice; try it!)]
Turned on and laughing at the same time; not a bad feeling, really.
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 09:50 pm (UTC)Oh no! I have never thought that before but now that you mention it I will never be able to not think it!
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 10:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 10:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 10:46 pm (UTC)::actually feels kind of bad::
::but not very on account of the funny::
(no subject)
Date: 30 Oct 2007 10:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 31 Oct 2007 12:17 am (UTC)I won't condemn the writing in a scene if I think character voice was true, but if I'm being *un*necessarily put off by euphemisms or that indefinable, yet laughable aura of Everything I Know I Learned From Reading Porn, then I'll probably nosewrinkle/mock/put the author on a mental blacklist.
All other things being equal, I'm with you on invisibility. I think 'dick' or 'cock' and 'ass' are generally the most common choices, in a conetemporary setting.
(no subject)
Date: 31 Oct 2007 12:20 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 31 Oct 2007 04:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 1 Nov 2007 10:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9 Nov 2007 03:12 am (UTC)