oh no, not another anachronism
13 Apr 2025 01:50 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Oh no, not my guy William Morris putting a New World ingredient in Europe 700 years too early!
brazil (plural brazils)
Noun. (obsolete) A red-orange dye obtained from brazil wood. [14th–17th c.]
ETA: this might be wrong! Thanks to
mildred_of_midgard, I now know the Wiktionary entry quoted above was incomplete 😠 and didn't inform me that brasilwood was a commonly used source of pigment/dye throughout Europe in the high middle ages and came from East Asia, frequently Ceylon (present-day Sri Lanka). (Brazil, the country, was named for the wood, because a close relative — the plant now known as Brazil wood — was plentiful there before being exploited almost entirely away.) The question remains whether this trade really did go so far back, but it's not so implausible after all. Morris was likely familiar with the dye's usage after 1000 CE and extrapolating backwards, as with the fiddle which was definitely incorrect, but it is possible that the wood was present in the book's setting (probably the 4th - 5th c. CE, somewhere in the a Carpathian region - see Wikipedia Hlöðskviða (also Hlǫðskviða and Hlǫðsqviða), known in English as The Battle of the Goths and Huns and occasionally known by its German name Hunnenschlachtlied for discussion of the possible historical context of the Old Norse heroic poem on the subject).
...came out of the house clad in a green kirtle and a gown of brazil, with a golden-hilted sword girt to her side.
—The Roots of the Mountains (1889), William Morris
brazil (plural brazils)
Noun. (obsolete) A red-orange dye obtained from brazil wood. [14th–17th c.]
ETA: this might be wrong! Thanks to
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)