(no subject)

[cimorene]

the shakespeare category at fanfiction.net is a cold and barren place. well, if by 'barren' you mean 'devoid of good fanfiction' and by 'cold' you mean 'rather disturbing in authors' notes and names and titles.' which i do.

i imagine much of it is like that.

what drives us to seek out bad fanfiction? and what drives people who can't write to attempt really difficult pastiches like shakespeare?

Comments

[cimness.livejournal.com]

wow, ouch.

of course i know in the future, buses will be my fate.

and no kinko's!

the cheap versions of literature DO get cheaper than that, but with footnotes is naturally better. i like the footnotes too. but i have one copy that i bought for a class and it's half footnotes. the play's printed only on the right of each page spread and the whole other HALF is footnotes, random illustrations and stupid little facts. it even has blank space. so basically it's twice as long as it needs to be--at least. in fact, i have another (older, smaller-print) copy that's less than a third the thickness.

[wolfsage.livejournal.com]

i think kinko's is american! so. ^^

buses aren't so bad.... they can be annoying, but i console myself with the fact that i can read instead of having to drive, and they are very cheap, and are good for the environment, compared to cars that is.

i did purchase a copy of 'the importance of being earnest' for $1.50. cheap as they come. that book doesn't exactly need footnotes, though, and i really couldn't resist. i LOVE that play.

there was some shakespeare like that i saw today... half footnotes. that's a little excessive. all i need's a few notes at the bottom. i know the *fancy* "Oxford Versions" we use at school are quite good when it comes to footnotes but just excessive on the introductory essays.... more than half the book is devoted to that. but those do have their uses, when it comes to writing papers.

[cimness.livejournal.com]

yeah, the introduction and afterword of Real Literature, esp. in the Literature section, are always useful for that. :)

i love 'the importance of being earnest' too. i was surprised how much less i liked, uh, whatsitwhatsit, 'an ideal husband.' the thing is that i just LOVE farce and satire. monty python, p.g. wodehouse (jeeves & wooster), good omens (although not all terry pratchett--he's a little too silly for me most of the time).

i prefer the darker farce and satire. and i want to recommend tom stoppard's one and only novel, long out of print, really old. it's called lord malquist and mr. moon. it's totally weird, incredibly surreal, i mean, really, REALLY surreal. and excellent farce. it's brilliant. but it's hard to get a hold of. if they have it at your library, though! mine did. i should've done that at my school--can't get out of print hardbacks for as little as the missing book fine. :(

[wolfsage.livejournal.com]

i've never actually read 'good omens'.... nor 'an ideal husband'. but i just fell in love with 'the importance of being earnest' when i read it in grade 12 lit class, and since then have been reading it online voraciously every few months. i just love how the humour is... well, not subtle, but clever. the entire play relies on wit, and that makes me extremely happy. i'm all for a little silly comedy once in a while but there's nothing lasting about it.

now i want to read that.... not at my school library, nor the public one, unfortunately. i'll check the bookstores, but it may be a losing game. ;_; he's a very clever man, though, and i may have to read some more of his plays.

[cimness.livejournal.com]

i don't even know what else he's written, giggle.

maybe inter-library loan could get it for you?

i haven't actually read the importance of being earnest. i saw the movie version with colin firth, rupert everett, reese witherspoon and... was it minnie driver?

[wolfsage.livejournal.com]

aaaaah have no clue. something like that. i can never remember their names. but that version was pretty good, yes. i still liked the play better. it's like... two hours to read it? you should! you can find it online, even. ^_^

[cimness.livejournal.com]

i'd better check it out from the library--severely restricted online time now.

OMG i got rosencrantz and guildenstern are dead from the library last night, and i finished it already. brilliant! fabulous! so sweet, poignant, hilarious. it adds some slashiness to the movie, but isn't overall more slashy cause the movie has chemistry (tim and gary being in loooooove helped a lot) and you can't duplicate that on the page. an eyefuck is worth a thousand words. BUT i still love it... i want to type it all up, but i don't think i have time. i have this fic-itch. maybe slashing tim and gary will satisfy it.

[wolfsage.livejournal.com]

oooh, i see. i wouldn't have thought! well you've disappeared a bit lately, i noticed! :3

isn't it awesome? i love it... i still have it around my room, i flip it open once in a while.

you know, i think the main slashiness is in the stage directions, you know, their actions. maybe a sub story plot. ^o^

dude i was supposed to write that slash after i watched the movie. i'm so pissed i can't find it.

[cimness.livejournal.com]

hmmm... now i'll have to re-read it again (she said happily), paying attention to the stage directions.