inv-only snape/harry community?
2 Oct 2004 08:32 pmi know there are harry/snape addicts who don't like crap fic. i wonder if there'd be a market for an invitation-only community like
shacking_up? could be a good place to rec, for people who do that, and a good place to read for people who are afraid to read very far because of the daunting quantity of badfic.
(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 12:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 12:18 pm (UTC)Dude, I think there'd be a *huge* interest in it. The funny thing is, even though I really don't like the idea behind
So. Yeah. I'd probably pimp it, shipper though I'm not. :))
(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 12:28 pm (UTC)Really? The first invite-only LJ community I ever came across for H/D was
(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 12:59 pm (UTC)Good points. Diagon Alley (coincidentally run by Sheena as well) is also invitation-only, and there are a lot of smaller tiny h/d fic archives that are pretty much run by requesting fanfics the owner likes. Also Pure Magnetism is supposedly coming back at some unspecified point in future (though that's what they they said about Snitchfiction, so who knows). And also, there are just *so* many H/D communities out there, and I can't off the top of my head think of any harry/snape communities. there's more of a need for an h/s community, and if it's going to start off strong, starting it invite-only is probably just going to be a good thing.
And to be totally honest, it's also that I have a thing, you may say it's irrational or oversensitive, about any community that sort of sets out to be exclusive. Invitation-only fic archives and LJ communities can have standards without being truly exclusive--the PSA, for example, is a good example of that. Pornish Pixies is another. I just felt that seekertoseeker was going in the direction of being subjective and selective, and that already too many people were looking at it and going, "oh, all those people must be BNFs"--which I think is ridiculous, and not the fault of the community at all--but it was something that made me a little wary. Also, there was the fact that most of the fics that were being posted there were crossposts of popular fics that had already been widely read and distributed--and I tend to not see a need for something like that as much as a need for a strong forum where developing writers can write in a positive environment and get good feedback, and where good writers can post fics to an immediate audience.
Those were my subjective impressions initially of seekertoseeker, and if I turn out to be wrong as I watch the community develop then I'll probably re-join. But on the whole I think I'd feel better overall about a harry/snape community that's invite-only because i think that, since there's more of a direct need for a strong harry/snape community, it has more potential to sidestep the issues i was concerned with and bring good new fic right to the community, instead of through other more general avenues.
(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 01:23 pm (UTC)I think cim is proposing a similar system, unless I'm mistaken. I essentially allow myself to make my own invitations on a completely subjective basis, and then if there are other authors people want to see, this allows for that as well. I think something like this might help make other invite-only comms such as
I'll also say that it's sort of necessary to be an elitist bitch to run these sorts of communities, and as there is so much crap to wade through for any pairing, sometimes it helps to have a snob in the midst. There are already plenty of communities that do more inclusive work. I'd hope that if this community started as invite-only, it would remain so, and let comms like
(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 01:45 pm (UTC)See, I *love* those rules and I think it's really helpful in sort of balancing what is, to me, not so much exclusivity as a general standard of excellence, with an open-door policy.
I also know that Seeker to Seeker has a similar rule in that once you've joined the community you can rec another writer to join it as well. Your way, though seems a little more democratic. And I will also add that one of my favorite communities,
I think
(no subject)
Date: 3 Oct 2004 09:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 3 Oct 2004 12:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 01:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 01:41 pm (UTC)Only please, please don't use the word Snarry in the community, or I will be forced to never read it.
(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 01:53 pm (UTC)Heh. Word.
(no subject)
Date: 3 Oct 2004 09:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 01:52 pm (UTC)Do it do it do it! ::waves pompoms::
(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 02:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 02:16 pm (UTC)Harry/Snape
Date: 2 Oct 2004 02:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 03:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 03:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 05:15 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 05:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 3 Oct 2004 09:12 am (UTC)there's even been a partial drying up of the bad stuff, which is discouraging even though i have no desire to read it, you know? but that's what got me thinking.
(no subject)
Date: 5 Oct 2004 08:21 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5 Oct 2004 03:33 pm (UTC)i don't agree, although admittedly, my standards go down SOME in this pairing and others i like a lot. if badfic is all i see, i don't read anything.
(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 05:27 pm (UTC)On the other hand, if I was invited, of course, I'd be all for it.
(no subject)
Date: 2 Oct 2004 08:09 pm (UTC)hmmm
Date: 2 Oct 2004 10:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 3 Oct 2004 08:13 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 4 Oct 2004 05:19 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5 Oct 2004 08:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5 Oct 2004 08:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5 Oct 2004 01:26 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5 Oct 2004 03:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5 Oct 2004 11:31 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 5 Oct 2004 11:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 6 Oct 2004 01:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 11 Oct 2004 05:30 am (UTC)