neither an essay nor a review
16 Aug 2005 05:29 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
[17:05] cimness: ...
[17:05] cimness: ...
[17:05] cimness: ...
[17:05] cimness: ...
[17:05] cimness: i...
[17:05] cimness: what?
[17:05] ghetto hobbit: hahahahahah)
over the last two days i finally read jonathan strange & mr norrell. i told
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
i found it riveting. i adored the voice (although i could have enjoyed more period flavour. it wasn't really quite austenian). i didn't object to the multiple points of view at all.
i find its particular position with regards to homosociality really fascinating. i might have just been thinking that because
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
i wanted more about the gentleman with thistledown hair--wanted him woven into the plot more, the historical part perhaps--some of the part that didn't have explicitly and directly to do with him. and i wanted either more of john uskglass or less of him--one appearance in person in that many pages seemed a bit odd, although i guess you could possibly count it as two, with the giant raven's eye in the library windows. there were a couple of tiny things, little threads, which are the kinds of things you generally find in the first few novels of any excellent writer.
(no subject)
Date: 18 Aug 2005 09:53 am (UTC)