one for science
22 Dec 2005 04:17 pmtammy kitzmiller et al vs. dover area school district: a us district court case which struck down a creationist disclaimer sticker in a science textbook (this one went further than alabama's and encouraged students to voluntarily read a creationist textbook which the board purchased as well).
so long and so, so delightful. ahhhhhhhh.
(no subject)
Date: 22 Dec 2005 05:40 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22 Dec 2005 08:39 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22 Dec 2005 08:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 22 Dec 2005 09:11 pm (UTC)and i'd totally have gone arond for months wanting to stab people in the face if that had been MY hometown. my schoolboard's awful but they're not as blatant, shameless or stupid as that. quite.
(no subject)
Date: 22 Dec 2005 09:46 pm (UTC)Throughout the trial and in various submissions to the Court, Defendants vigorously argue that the reading of the statement is not “teaching” ID but instead is merely “making students aware of it.” In fact, one consistency among the Dover School Board members’ testimony, which was marked by selective memories and outright lies under oath, as will be discussed in more detail below, is that they did not think they needed to be knowledgeable about ID because it was not being taught to the students. We disagree.
Dr. Alters, the District’s own science teachers, and Plaintiffs Christy Rehm and Steven Stough, who are themselves teachers, all made it abundantly clear by their testimony that an educator reading the disclaimer is engaged in teaching, even if it is colossally bad teaching.
(no subject)
Date: 23 Dec 2005 10:12 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23 Dec 2005 02:57 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 23 Dec 2005 10:12 am (UTC)