Stop Airbrushing My Dudes!
8 Apr 2008 08:38 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Fic peeves: you know how most people look sort of normal? Of course there's a bell-curve of normal, and movie stars don't map out along the bell curve and tv stars don't either. Some shows are eerie to watch because everyone's really attractive.
But: blockbuster movies do that more than your average weekly primetime show. I mean, yeah, Emily Deschanel and all the women on the CSIs and all the women in the Stargate shows are... pretty hot. But nobody's perfect even so, and there's a wide sample of dudes on tv who are downright funny-looking.
Even when you're in love with someone, and are perfectly convinced that their crooked little nose or their funny lantern-jaw are perfect and would be inferior if they looked more average, you are not under the illusion that these things are perfect. And especially if they're pudgy you're unlikely to think their abdomens look like a washboard, okay.
It's not an insult to say that Blair Sandburg, Duncan MacLeod and Methos, Bodie and Doyle, Starsky and Hutch, etc look knobbly, lopsided, dopey, unibrowed, soft around the middle, or a bit cross-eyed if it's true and it certainly doesn't mean they're not slashy. I mean, it's not like people from all along the bell curve don't fall in love and hook up and have all sorts of sexual preferences!
So, you know, it really, severely throws me out of a story if a pov character who doesn't seem to be unreliable in other aspects, and has a firm grip on reality, suddenly starts saying that someone's hairless when they're hairy, tall when they're average, flawlessly or classically handsome when they're squinty and lopsided or knobbly or hawk-nosed or unibrowed (they might be extraordinarily handsome, of course. Just not classically or flawlessly so), or amber-eyed when their eyes are incontrovertibly green or hazel, or green-eyed when their eyes are brown, or golden-haired when they're a brunette, or milky-pale when they're kind of pleasantly tanned and olive.
I mean, you're not blind, and your readers aren't either. If you have to recast the show in your head, or airbrush the hell out of everything like stretchmarks and love handles on a swimsuit model, before you can get off on the characters getting off - well, okay. I think it's sad, but I can't do anything about it. But what in Bob's name makes you think it's a good idea to change random easily observable visual facts about canon in your fanfiction?
But: blockbuster movies do that more than your average weekly primetime show. I mean, yeah, Emily Deschanel and all the women on the CSIs and all the women in the Stargate shows are... pretty hot. But nobody's perfect even so, and there's a wide sample of dudes on tv who are downright funny-looking.
Even when you're in love with someone, and are perfectly convinced that their crooked little nose or their funny lantern-jaw are perfect and would be inferior if they looked more average, you are not under the illusion that these things are perfect. And especially if they're pudgy you're unlikely to think their abdomens look like a washboard, okay.
It's not an insult to say that Blair Sandburg, Duncan MacLeod and Methos, Bodie and Doyle, Starsky and Hutch, etc look knobbly, lopsided, dopey, unibrowed, soft around the middle, or a bit cross-eyed if it's true and it certainly doesn't mean they're not slashy. I mean, it's not like people from all along the bell curve don't fall in love and hook up and have all sorts of sexual preferences!
So, you know, it really, severely throws me out of a story if a pov character who doesn't seem to be unreliable in other aspects, and has a firm grip on reality, suddenly starts saying that someone's hairless when they're hairy, tall when they're average, flawlessly or classically handsome when they're squinty and lopsided or knobbly or hawk-nosed or unibrowed (they might be extraordinarily handsome, of course. Just not classically or flawlessly so), or amber-eyed when their eyes are incontrovertibly green or hazel, or green-eyed when their eyes are brown, or golden-haired when they're a brunette, or milky-pale when they're kind of pleasantly tanned and olive.
I mean, you're not blind, and your readers aren't either. If you have to recast the show in your head, or airbrush the hell out of everything like stretchmarks and love handles on a swimsuit model, before you can get off on the characters getting off - well, okay. I think it's sad, but I can't do anything about it. But what in Bob's name makes you think it's a good idea to change random easily observable visual facts about canon in your fanfiction?
(no subject)
Date: 8 Apr 2008 05:54 pm (UTC)It irked the hell out of me in the X-files fandom, though. Because if Fox Mulder is in his early forties, yes, let's write him as soft skinned and bright eyed and generally looking like a twelve year old girl.
(no subject)
Date: 8 Apr 2008 06:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 8 Apr 2008 06:12 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 8 Apr 2008 06:44 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 8 Apr 2008 06:15 pm (UTC)Still. Blair Sandburg is observably not so small he can practically fit into Jim's pocket, to choose a story example I still haven't forgotten after ten years. If you're changing so many things about the characters that the only resemblance to canon is the names, wouldn't you be better off just writing original fic?
(no subject)
Date: 8 Apr 2008 06:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 10:30 pm (UTC)Back in the day I think we used to girlify Doyle slightly (I say this not in terms of fic but in terms of teenage girl viewing practices) because he had lovely curls and played the guitar and had moments of great sensitivity. But in actual fact he was a violent little Brummie shit most of the time. *swoons*
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 07:16 pm (UTC)Yeah, right. :-)
Picture that face with make-up. He'd make a butt-ugly woman. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 8 Apr 2008 06:57 pm (UTC)I mean...what?
(And I'm suddenly reminded of that one Star Wars fic I read where poor Obi-Wan was described as having curvy hips.)
(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 10:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 10:32 pm (UTC)It was this huge, long series, too. I wish the old VC archive hadn't disappeared.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 11:06 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 07:29 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 8 Apr 2008 07:48 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 8 Apr 2008 11:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 08:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 07:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 08:04 pm (UTC)Oh dear. Why even bother with canon at this point.
(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 09:52 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 10:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 8 Apr 2008 08:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 8 Apr 2008 10:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 07:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 3 May 2008 02:35 am (UTC)Enough said on the subject of Rodney's physique. ~.^
DragonLady
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 07:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 07:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 01:52 pm (UTC)(here from metafandom)
I always think... "Have you ever tried a princess carry?" Unless you're lifting someone a lot smaller than you, your arms give out pretty fast. You ever notice how mothers rest their kids on their hips, or how firemen sling rescuees over their shoulders? It's because that's how you don't kill your arms.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 10:05 pm (UTC)Funny story- I actually have tried to carry some one that way. Back when I was young, and still lifting weights. Picture 160lb female carrying 170 lb male friend. I made it about 5 steps and then my knees went and we both went down.
Anyway, this, I assume, is one of the practical reasons hollywood insists on thin-bordering-on -anorexic leading ladies. And I'm impressed almost everytime some poor leading man has to heft even these relative light weights, since I know they have to do it multiple times to get the take during filming. I guess it supposed to demonstrate what big strong men they are, and as a female I'm supposed to admire/desire/value this trait. And then that romantic image gets pulled into fanfic.
(no subject)
Date: 11 Apr 2008 10:58 pm (UTC)And firemen carries are uncomfortable for the person being carried, and consequently unromantic. But I don't get the fetish about carrying people.
(no subject)
Date: 3 May 2008 02:52 am (UTC)I second the baffled on that one. The only slash pairing -- and I mean the only, and that is a "barely" only -- that could get away with that sort of thing is Ronon/Zelenka because Ronon is so Paul-Bunyan-brawny and Zelenka is so, um, well, not (even Lorne is taller, though it's only by an inch or so).
This isn't technically "airbrushing" but it is "girlifying," but there was this one Rodney/Radek fic where Radek said something along the lines of, "I share one kiss and a bed and you think I'll just roll over and spread them" to which Rodney replied in all sincerity that what he meant/was after was "cuddling and kissing, you know, touch."
Words fail me. This is Rodney -- remember all the stuff with Sam? Like, oh, say, the vid where he felt the need to exposit on how he masturbated to her image (granted, he was pretty sleep deprived), but still, "no sex" are you freaking kidding me?
DragonLady
(no subject)
Date: 7 May 2008 04:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 8 Apr 2008 11:41 pm (UTC)I'm having a Spike/Xander renaissance right now, and reading through the archive like an obsessed person, and the sheer number of people who write stories set in the last season of the show but insist on casting a younger, thinner Xander into the role are just driving me batshit. And the people who are writing *post* series stories who insist on giving Xander some sort of horrifying trauma and/or malaria for the sole purpose of justifying their desire to have him be suddenly slender are killing me. Fandom anorexia is just yuck.
(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 06:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 10:32 pm (UTC)But I've always cringed that most Xander writers seem to write s2 Xander, when the actor was unusually thin, into seasons 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and beyond.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 02:20 am (UTC)As for the slash, it's gotten to where I find myself shocked if I read a story set in later seasons or after S7 in which there isn't a line or sentence in which Xander's reset.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 02:31 am (UTC)Ha, I hear you. I had so many weird fannish interactions with people during s7 when I would say that I thought Nick Brendon still looked good, and there was just so much disparaging of his weight gain that was more evident end of s6 and in s7. Still, on Ats I think David Boreanaz got worse criticism during the last season of Angel for weight gain. Never mind the poor guy had a bum knee that had to be operated on, and so of course he gained weight in the interim while he had to be less active.
You know, there is one fic I know of focusing *on* Xander's weight gain, kind of a h/c in which Spike basically instigates Xander's loss of confidence over how he looks and then helps to build it up once they become romantically involved. It is one of the very few fics I know of which does such a thing -- if you're at all interested, here's the info: Going Soft (http://sinandcinnamon.livejournal.com/6984.html) by
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 09:00 pm (UTC)And yes, I had wondered whether the addiction issues figured in, and on what timeline. It's odd but I guess I just wasn't tuned into the fandom at the time enough to read boards or hear the crit (which is probably good, as I would've been tearing off people's heads left and right).
Just in terms of Angel vs. Xander, while it seems reasonable that Xander should change (because, y'know, human), the vampire thing suggests an unchanging body (which can make any change seem all the weirder), though of course anyone looking at Spike over the course of Buffy and Angel has to notice that Spike changed as well.
In terms of rationalizing or explaining it, I'd be happy to see someone arguing that somehow, vampires' bodies change in relation to blood supply (though much hand-waving has to be done there).
But for the humans (and I haven't yet read that story you linked to) my first impulse is to say that I'd rather it not become a h/c issue, because that's making too much of it--pathologizing it rather than accepting the mutability of the human body as a part of human life.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 06:37 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 09:03 pm (UTC)I was reading something last night (Road Coveredwith Blood), actually, where Cordelia asks Xander about his weight loss and he snarks that it's the "grief and grapefruit diet" and Cordelia tells him that grapefruit are so last year, and it was the first time I actually enjoyed one of those lines, because within it was at least the suggestion that, y'know, it might not be a good thing and that maybe, if Xander were happy, he might not be so thin, y'know? Because the logic in a lot of stories isn't carried through in stories where suffering=erotic thinness.
(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 01:52 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 07:00 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 02:31 am (UTC)Then I watch the actual show, and I like Shep a lot in all his kind of nasally laconic obnoxiousness, but charming and beautiful and universally appealing... not so much.
On the other hand, I also hate SGA stories that seem to make excuses about people being attracted to Rodney even though he's supposedly physically oh-so-average or "overweight" or whatever.
Holy shit, what? I know the show makes fat jokes at his expense too, and that's fucked up also, because imo, having a barely-visible stomach and a fleshy chin at forty is not "fat". And it bugs the crap out of me when stories feel like they have to give elaborate other reasons for people to think Rodney is hot because of course they would never find his body sexy. Despite the fact that legions of fangirls demonstrably do find everything about the guy sexy.
So uh... yeah. Rantage, sorry about that. I agree with you, and it goes both ways. The airbrushing sucks, and IMO, making excuses for characters that aren't airbrushed also sucks.
(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 07:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 10:11 pm (UTC)I have never been able to figure this out...
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 02:31 am (UTC)What!? Did these writers not watch the show, ever?
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 04:17 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 03:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 04:18 am (UTC)Here via Metafandom
Date: 9 Apr 2008 10:12 pm (UTC)Love how you made your argument eloquent and short and avoided rantage, I really enjoyed reading it.
(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 10:13 pm (UTC)Here via Metafandom
Date: 9 Apr 2008 10:21 pm (UTC)Re: Here via Metafandom
Date: 11 Apr 2008 10:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 10:35 pm (UTC)In line with what I commented to another respondent above, I get particularly peeved at people who do story-focused makeovers, like Xander losing weight because he's working more in construction, or Snape suddenly stumbling across a range of haircare products, so that everyone around them thinks, "Okay, *now* he's handsome and worthy of desire!"
Thank goodness I've never seen fics in which people get actual plastic surgery (though I'm sure they exist; just... *shudders*).
(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 11:13 pm (UTC)It especially skeeves me because it's usually being done to female characters, and it feeds off of the whole (ugly) societal stereotype that says if a woman doesn't look like a swimsuit model, she's unattractive.
I can't decide if it creeps me out more to see a male or a female author do it, but I've seen both. Ugh. DO NOT WANT.
(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 11:59 pm (UTC)If you feel like giving more details, I'm curious -- have you seen it more in BtVS, or in other fandoms as well? In any case, that's troubling. And I agree with you there - it's creepy both ways, whatever the author's identity.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 12:31 am (UTC)I mean, I guess it's just another way to accomplish the "redrawing" of characters that under discussion here, but even so.... *shudder*
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 12:41 am (UTC)Thanks for the reply!
(no subject)
Date: 9 Apr 2008 11:47 pm (UTC)This happens in so many of my other fandoms, and it bothers me so much when people in Crossing Jordan fandom are trying to make Nigel more universally appealing. He does not have six-pack abs and strong hands. He's LANKY and skinny in that Alan Cumming sort of way.
I like my fic realistic, thanks.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 12:00 am (UTC)(here from
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 02:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 12:20 pm (UTC)I can understand concentrating on the fact Gene/Phil has long, long legs, and elegant hands, and broad shoulders, and eyes/eyelashes to die for --- lying through omission, one might say. But downright lying? Wow.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 05:03 pm (UTC)There are no words.
(no subject)
Date: 11 Apr 2008 10:37 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 01:39 am (UTC)In SPN, where you have two incontrovertibly tall and good looking guys I've seen a few odd things said as well. The one I've seen most often is how Sam is dark-skinned. Granted he probably tans whereas Dean burns but he is anything but dark skinned. In one fic he was in disguise and his skin described as cinammon toned and I did not figure out it was him until he was revealed because I couldn't square that description with the character.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 02:43 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 04:01 am (UTC)Er ... I guess you're wondering what I mean by ultra realistic ... I'm sure there's a better term but I can't think of one right now. I mean the kind of story where the characters fart (with sound and smell described), burp, barf, scratch themselves, rub their curly-haired hairy (I can't emphasise the hair enough) chests together, go to the bathroom in front of each other because they just don't give a damn, have graphically described medical things done to various bodily orifices, etc.
Personally I think the explanation for the fluffy feminised stories is that some fanfic writers like to ignore all of the gritty things that men (and human beings in general) do and are. There's a convention in the romance genre ... er, probably in most genres, really ... where women never so much as break a sweat because it's not 'ladylike' or 'angelic' or whatever. Ladies don't sweat, they *glow*, and so forth. They're "perfect", "gorgeous" and "adorable", and they have "creamy alabaster skin" and "sparkling emerald-green orbs" (instead of eyes). So I think a large portion of slash writers are just applying this convention to men, which is, you know, not exactly productive, but it's never really been done before (except in yaoi anime and manga, I guess), so it's kind of interesting. It happens in het too, it's just people don't notice it so much because women are often depicted that way in mainstream culture.
Meanwhile, there's a backlash from writers who are getting as graphic as possible with their descriptions, often to the point that the narrative is superseded by the physicality of their characters (imo and all that).
I can see why people write and read both kinds of stories, but I'm definitely a middle-of-the-range kind of girl. Actually I prefer as few physical descriptions as possible, because I like just enough to get my imagination going.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 04:20 am (UTC)a) supernaturally-thin with glowing eyes and cheekbones and silky hair. And just - no. He was awkward-looking in S1 of House (the lighting did absolutely nothing to help, either), and really, if you want to see RSL with flowing hair and cheekbones that could cut glass, rent Dead Poets Society or Much Ado About Nothing.
b) a huge fatso because Robert Sean Leonard finally grew into his height around S3. Seriously, the man is perfectly normal-sized. Putting on a few pounds =/= "fat". EVER.
c) a flailing effeminate drama queen whose only hobby is pining after House, who is the only person he's ever loved. In fic, this is usually achieved by him having hideous fashion sense. Um, have you seen what he wears? With the color-coordination and lovely cut? (Okay, lavender shirts nonwithstanding). Look, I admit, the man does blow-dry his hair and apparently wears toenail polish, but seriously. He likes monster trucks. He plays practical jokes. He kicks all kinds of ass at poker. And he's a serial divorcee who's variably described as a "slut", who "loves everybody", and "always told his wives" when he did and didn't love them. It's fairly safe to say that he likes women and fell in love with other people.
I don't think anyone even wants to start me on the prettification of Greg House, whose stubble magically does not hurt when rubbed against sensitive body parts, whose leg scar is magically "not nearly as bad as you'd think" (um, we've SEEN it, it's pretty bad), and if I hear one more description of piercing or glowing or penetrating "indigo/cobalt/azure/navy/sky/etc orbs", I will scream. Yes, Hugh Laurie has drop-dead gorgeous eyes. No, we don't need to hear about them every ten lines.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 06:34 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 05:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 11:10 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 05:06 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 05:54 pm (UTC)HP Observations
Date: 10 Apr 2008 05:53 am (UTC)Handsome/beautiful: Gilderoy Lockhart, Tom Riddle (as a teenager), Thomas Riddle Sr., Sirius Black, Lily Potter, Fleur Weasley (formerly Delacourt), Bill Weasley (pre-Book 6), and Cedric Diggory.
Pretty: Hermione, Cho Chang, and Ginny Weasley.
I'm sure I've missed a few, but it's a short list. Much like real life, not everyone is drop dead gorgeous.
I still haven't decided which is more annoying: the outright "character makeover" (eg, Snape with a tan and blinding white, straight teeth + blond hair)or the "subtle change that nonetheless contradicts canonical" description (eg, Snape is taller than Sirius Black). I'm suspect that fanfic authors airbrush to show that their favorite character is good/worthy/superior. After all, good = handsome, tall, smart, etc., right?
It's painfully reductive, especially for a series where the author repeatedly points out that "It's your choices that make you who you are." Not your wealth, weight, house at Hogwarts, or your physical appearance. Ergo, Mad Eye Moody is ugly, but he's a good guy. Tom Riddle was a handsome young man who is rotten to the core. Lily Potter -- beautiful and good. Bellatrix Lestrange beautiful but bad. And there's a whole range of people in between in terms of both looks and goodness.
Re: HP Observations
Date: 10 Apr 2008 09:23 am (UTC)Word! She actually killed Snape off to DEMONSTRATE this to us!
Re: HP Observations
Date: 10 Apr 2008 06:45 pm (UTC)...HAHAHA WHAT. I've seen a great deal of things, but I've never seen BLOND SNAPE.
Re: HP Observations
Date: 11 Apr 2008 05:02 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 06:23 am (UTC)There's also a strange tendency to stretch out Mohinder. I keep reading stories that describe him as tall, which is ... interesting, when IMDB says Sendhil Ramamurthy is 5'9" (and I'm pretty sure that's in some pretty thick-soled shoes - dude's pretty tiny). In comparison, Greg Grunberg and Zachary Quinto are both listed as 6'2", so if your fic is describing Mohinder as taller than Matt or Sylar or even the same height, something is awry. He's nearly half a foot shorter.
I don't read much Peter fic, but the few I've seen describe a guy who's either way bigger or way smaller than Milo Ventimiglia actually is. Sylar also seems to get twinkified in some fic, and Nathan gets a height adjustment similar to Mohinder's. Canon Heroes has a pretty wide range of body types for a TV show (mostly among the men), but you wouldn't know that from reading the fic.
Here via MF
Date: 10 Apr 2008 12:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Apr 2008 12:19 pm (UTC)I so agree with this.
There was one writer in my primary fandom (Life on Mars) who used to do that and I just... what? What what? Aren't they great because they are the other side of ordinary? Doesn't it give them character? Can't you capitalise on that?
here via metafandom
Date: 10 Apr 2008 09:11 pm (UTC)That's all I have to say.