cimorene: closeup of a large book held in a woman's hands as she flips through it (reading)
[personal profile] cimorene
Given the commonness of this whole trope where the narrator, and sometimes everyone else except one intelligent character, is so clueless that they are continually surprised by everything that happens in the most obnoxious way while the writer ensures that the reader is anything but surprised...

... It's just occurred to me, for the first time, that it's got to be knowingly and deliberately employed by the authors. Does that mean people like it? Are there readers who regard it as a cherished and even favorite device? Does it come off as funny rather then agonizing, sort of like those people who like secondhand embarrassment humor?

(no subject)

Date: 8 Feb 2021 01:51 pm (UTC)
princessofgeeks: Shane smiling, caption Canada's Shane Hollander (Default)
From: [personal profile] princessofgeeks
This happens not infrequently in the Hercule Poirot mysteries, and frequently in the Jeeves and Wooster stories I read.

I think if the clueless characters are presented as comic, and that's done well, I find it less annoying.

But I guess it's fun for the reader to be "in the know"? Gives the reader a sense of superiority?

But it has an Andy Griffith Show feel to it alot of the time.

Profile

cimorene: cartoony drawing of a woman's head in profile giving dubious side-eye (Default)
Cimorene

January 2026

S M T W T F S
    123
4 567 89 10
11 12 1314 15 1617
181920 21222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

  • Style: Practically Dracula for Practicalitesque - Practicality (with tweaks) by [personal profile] cimorene
  • Resources: Dracula Theme

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated 23 Jan 2026 04:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios