Richard I, actually?
23 May 2025 01:43 pmAfter reading the introduction to Scott's The Talisman, I was kind of like ... Whoa Richard the Lionheart was somewhat horrible? I only knew about him previously from like. Robin Hood. And Ivanhoe, which is almost the same thing. (In retrospect it's not surprising that these sources were not very reliable.)
Now that I've read a bunch of articles on Wikipedia I know that historians debate, but he is widely considered arguably a bad king and not great guy, although definitely a very good warrior and general. And he did punish anti-semitic rioters one time. But other than that, there's little to be said for him except that his brother John was worse.
Scott was a fan, but his introduction doesn't really have any more to say in his favor, just basically: He was brave! and He was super into the Crusade! The latter may argue for his emotions and conviction of purpose, but I can't count it as a positive overall.
All that said, clearly people are not reading The Talisman, or there would be way more Richard I/Saladin on AO3.
Now that I've read a bunch of articles on Wikipedia I know that historians debate, but he is widely considered arguably a bad king and not great guy, although definitely a very good warrior and general. And he did punish anti-semitic rioters one time. But other than that, there's little to be said for him except that his brother John was worse.
Scott was a fan, but his introduction doesn't really have any more to say in his favor, just basically: He was brave! and He was super into the Crusade! The latter may argue for his emotions and conviction of purpose, but I can't count it as a positive overall.
All that said, clearly people are not reading The Talisman, or there would be way more Richard I/Saladin on AO3.
(no subject)
Date: 27 May 2025 03:44 pm (UTC)However! For reliable quality and an affordable piston pen? Twsbi is still the way to go. You have to be careful not to over tighten the screw-on joints including the cap (that's how I broke one), but even if it breaks after a few years it is arguably a good purchase. Once you get much cheaper than this a piston pen is usually just not very good. And you wouldn't want the first one you bought to be a Pelikan - the price is too high for an experiment!
But if you want to give stub nibs a try affordably, I would probably recommend a Lamy Safari fountain pen with a stub nib and a converter. You have to purchase the converter and the italic/stub nib separately but it's still more affordable than most other options. Also you will have the other nib if you don't turn out to like stub, and the classic Safari is extremely sturdy, nearly indestructible (the shiny plastic ones are made of ABS aka Lego). It's a pen you can carry with you anywhere (hence the name). I used to have four of them and a bunch of different nibs and I will say that their nibs are good and easy to switch and their converters are quite good too. So I'm really mad at Lamy about the proprietary cartridges but otoh... I can't not use or not recommend them at the cheap price point. The difference in quality and reliability of their nibs vs Kaweco! Read the fountain section of the Safari guide, which links to an article about converters: https://www.jetpens.com/blog/LAMY-safari-A-Comprehensive-Guide/pt/176#LAMY%20safari%20Fountain%20Pens
As for metal pens... It's a love/hate thing. Sometimes I really want one and they are generally more durable... but they have a serious problem with posting the cap on the back of the pen - in tons of metal pens it just won't stay on! And that is practically unusable to me.