![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
wtf? pwp fades to teacup poodle methos convinced duncan is going to leave him soon, then duncan convinces him with a few sentences that his insecurity is unfounded and the story closes with: And as they kissed again a pair of night-hunting hawks flew silhouetted across the moon. uh... well... good for them? the weird thing is that last night i read two really good stories by esjay, the same author--the marrying kind and straight and low, the latter of which was truly outstanding, well-characterised, hilarious and wicked and unfolding perfectly--in short exemplary story-telling. like... what happened?
this icon is a group effort, the result of
mace_m's couch and highlander eps and comments by everybody present, more or less. as the eminent master chi has said, who cares that you can barely read it?
this icon is a group effort, the result of
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
(no subject)
Date: 14 Feb 2005 01:28 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14 Feb 2005 01:30 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14 Feb 2005 01:35 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14 Feb 2005 01:50 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14 Feb 2005 02:36 am (UTC)Sure. But it's been a while since the last time I read anything that long. My favorite fics of all time range from 95,000 words to 412,000 and on to a huge arc of 12 fics in which the parts vary between 10,000 and 107,000 words. Longer the better, but I havent really found anything good and epic in my recent obsessions. More's the wah.
I think the thing I love about long and involved fics is that they have a way of sticking with you that short fics, no matter how good, can't really accomplish.
(no subject)
Date: 14 Feb 2005 10:56 am (UTC)it's probably a difference in brain chemistry or something. my attention span is short in everything, not just stories. although i remember when i was a child reading novels all day, they have to be quite good, and it's easier to find high quality science fiction than high quality fan fiction. especially if your parents have a large private library of it... .
(no subject)
Date: 14 Feb 2005 03:28 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14 Feb 2005 04:06 pm (UTC):cough: kind of embarrassing, but since the entry was overall, i think, more complimentary of the other stories than critical of the pwp, i feel relieved of the need to apologise. "straight and low" was delightful and wonderful in so many, many ways.
(no subject)
Date: 14 Feb 2005 04:15 pm (UTC)But I'll tell you a weird and scary thing. I got about twice as much feedback for that piece of utter horseshit than I did for 'The Marrying Kind'. If anyone can explain that to me, I'd be glad to hear it.
(no subject)
Date: 14 Feb 2005 04:39 pm (UTC)"a romantic comedy, except not."
"not romantic? not a comedy?"
"no! it's romantic and it's a comedy, but it's--ahahah."
"not a typical romantic comedy...?"
"no, it kind of is, in a way--like, you know, a romantic comedy MOVIE, except... not, because..."
"uh-huh."
"see, it's really really funny, and it has a kind of romantic comedy plot, and it's kind of light..."
"uh-huh."
it reduced me to incoherence! it was so much fun! i should send you some feedback. let's see if i can remember to do it.
(no subject)
Date: 14 Feb 2005 05:11 pm (UTC)Oh, and you've spurred me to do what I've been meaning to for ages - stick the posting dates on the story listings on my website.
(no subject)
Date: 14 Feb 2005 05:50 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15 Feb 2005 12:24 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15 Feb 2005 01:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 14 Feb 2005 05:45 pm (UTC)Since I doubt I'll ever get off my ass to send any real feedback, I'll clarify what I said above and this time actually aim it where it matters, aka you: some of your stories, such as the abovementioned Straight and Low and The Marrying Kind I've enjoyed enormously, and there's no way I would've trudged through the Kiss series if I'd thought it wasn't worth it. The third part showed how much you've developed as a writer (although I had some minor disagreements about how the story was handled, but, but, this isn't the place for them), so I shouldn't have been surprised to find that some of your (obviously older) works are ...ahem... less than brilliant. ::g::
But I'll tell you a weird and scary thing. I got about twice as much feedback for that piece of utter horseshit than I did for 'The Marrying Kind'. If anyone can explain that to me, I'd be glad to hear it.
Uhh, if I can manage to read the 'piece of utter horseshit' I'll share my theories. ::g:: Unfortunately I think it's just the way of fandom: overdone emotional crap rakes in the reviews.
(no subject)
Date: 15 Feb 2005 12:34 am (UTC)Please don't read it*g*. It's embarrassing and it's not like I'm going to rewrite it or anything. I'm well aware of its myriad faults. But if you were ever moved to crit any of my recent stuff, I'd be more than happy to hear it.
As for the Kiss series, the first story (and yeah, I know it has problems) was written a few months after I started writing. I had a lot of crappy writing habits to overcome and it took me a long time to work my way through them. The second story is basically a vignette caused by too many U2 songs. The third one I'm actually fairly pleased with. There are spots I'd change if I was interested in rewriting it, but overall, as a first novel I think it works. There's some hokey plot devices and a few dodgy story developments, but I'm still pretty fond of the old monster. It was fun to write.