extra-eso lotr rps recs?
28 Nov 2005 02:43 pmit's been snowing rather furiously all day: pretty but not so fun to walk in. it's nice and cosy in here, of course, but a warm little kitty just climbed in my lap and i hate to dislodge her just to go to my sociology group meeting (i am going to, obviously, i just don't want to).
i've been indulging myself going through
esorlehcar5's lotr rps recs the past couple of days (and ripping them off, of course; i don't have any direct-non-mediated interaction with that fandom anymore, but i pillage eso's recs for my recs page regularly). when i was scanning through each individual line in my awfully disorganised page at every new rec because i couldn't remember if i'd already recced it, i finally realised i was going to have to do something about that state of disorganisation. so now i've just spent about an hour alphabetising and sorting by pairing my lord of the rings and lotr rps recs (surprised me in several ways: for instance, that there's hardly any merry/pippin and almost twice as much legolas/gimli as frodo/sam, and that there's barely any billy/elijah, and more dom/billy than dom/elijah).
wait, i'm coming to the point... there it is! so i was wondering: can anyone recommend another good source of lotr rps recs aside from esorlehcar?
i've been indulging myself going through
wait, i'm coming to the point... there it is! so i was wondering: can anyone recommend another good source of lotr rps recs aside from esorlehcar?
(no subject)
Date: 28 Nov 2005 12:47 pm (UTC)I know there are others... obviously
other than that, am not sure i know of an organised regular reccer... *thinks*
(no subject)
Date: 28 Nov 2005 05:54 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 28 Nov 2005 06:08 pm (UTC)wot.
:D
(no subject)
Date: 28 Nov 2005 06:29 pm (UTC)i'm an idiot.
and of course you're right--that is no doubt the reason. funny i never noticed though!
(no subject)
Date: 28 Nov 2005 01:25 pm (UTC)Except it's pretty small, and the ye olde favourites are well-represented. There's a few things you don't have, though.
So that solves about a hundredth of your problem, omg.
Actually...
(no subject)
Date: 28 Nov 2005 05:51 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 29 Nov 2005 07:32 am (UTC)... in that case, send pics!
(no subject)
Date: 2 Dec 2005 10:28 pm (UTC)