patrick stewart/brent spiner rps

oneko_briar, here's your birthday fic which i'm afraid is too weird. luckily, you like weird. there are moments of suckiness and in the end it doesn't all come together and make sense. the whole thing is like a freaky dream. i hope you like it.

title: que amarraron al cielo
author: cim
pairing: patrick stewart/brent spiner (star trek:tng actor rps)
rating: pg
summary: it's the ages unexpectedly switched story transposed from romantic comedy to tragicomic happy angst. um. yes, really.

( ages fudged. i've made brent exactly 10 years younger than he really is. i feel he looked more like 28 than 38 in the early trek episodes and i wanted a contrast. it's all fiction anyway. )

OH MY GOD

al;sdkfjas; d VIGGO a;dsogalkjfg?

::fizz:: ::crackle::

um. hi. ::uses new icon::

i think i'll stop uploading icons now.

holy shit, i'm at forty-five.

remember this one, elfiepike? XD

guinevere33! do you mind...

...if i co-opt your caption and make my own 'earl grey' icon? because i need a captain picard. but i might do 'make it so' instead.

p.s. patrick stewart and brent spiner consider themselves best friends in real life and spiner was stewart's best man for his second wedding, omg, and NIMOY WAS SHATNER'S BEST THE SECOND TIME ROUND TOO. LOVE.

(no subject)

damn AND blast, but my e-mail isn't working!

but today i got a packet of four books by pg wodehouse from the best beta ever. she must love me more than i realized. certainly i am coming to a better understanding of my affection for her. fabulous. i'm deeply infatuated with wodehouse. clearly an influence, say, on douglas addams. reminds me of austen in the best of ways. it's so... so... auuugh! dry! fabulous! slashy! but so few slashers of my knowledge could possibly do it justice.

i'm going to give the e-mail another try, she said fretfully.

(no subject)

i will apparently NEVER be able to send mail from the mail client in the browser.

and now my webmail seems to not want to send things either.

::headdesk::

homophobia just makes no sense.

clearly i'm not having a good day, but. i feel like i'm missing something essential to understand it. what's the matter with any sort of sexuality? why should you care more about someone's sexual preference than about, say, whether they prefer carrots to broccoli?

(no subject)

GAH STUPID E-MAIL