![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I've noticed a distinct pattern in some fannish people I know IRL, which is that the ones who don't Go Here in fandom never know when people and movies are canceled or on notice and usually haven't even heard a hint of why they're problematic, leading to hundreds of instances of this conversation:
Explaining the controversy isn't that difficult if it's just something like "Actually it turns out that the director/writer went on a bigoted rant/has been accused of sexual harrassment" or "The role of X was whitewashed". But in the case of the well-meaning but clueless social-justice-supporting white people - initially mostly my parents, but a few members of my generation who just happen to also be Luddites - they never seem to notice cultural appropriation, white savior narratives, fridging, or unfortunate political ramifications, and the repetitiveness of this same consciousness-raising conversation with its small list of curated reference links starts to feel uncomfortably didactic, especially because the more awkward I feel, the harder I have to work to explain coherently.
The temptation is strong to just say nothing about it to escape this, but it seems a bit shady to not even indicate I was put off by something about it, if they were engaging me in fannish conversation in good faith.
THEM: I saw [media thing associated with a controversy].
ME: Yikes...
THEM: It was so good!
Explaining the controversy isn't that difficult if it's just something like "Actually it turns out that the director/writer went on a bigoted rant/has been accused of sexual harrassment" or "The role of X was whitewashed". But in the case of the well-meaning but clueless social-justice-supporting white people - initially mostly my parents, but a few members of my generation who just happen to also be Luddites - they never seem to notice cultural appropriation, white savior narratives, fridging, or unfortunate political ramifications, and the repetitiveness of this same consciousness-raising conversation with its small list of curated reference links starts to feel uncomfortably didactic, especially because the more awkward I feel, the harder I have to work to explain coherently.
The temptation is strong to just say nothing about it to escape this, but it seems a bit shady to not even indicate I was put off by something about it, if they were engaging me in fannish conversation in good faith.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Oct 2019 04:04 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Oct 2019 06:55 pm (UTC)Although if the people in question have already voiced the thought that you're just a humorless feminist SJW buzzkill, then some dumbing-down is probably necessary. But with someone who hasn't done that and is pro-SJW but just not as educated, I feel bad if I assume bad faith.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Oct 2019 12:32 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Oct 2019 06:51 pm (UTC)I mean I am sure I understand your comment so this basically makes sense in context, but.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Oct 2019 07:22 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Oct 2019 02:05 pm (UTC)"I haven't seen it because, I heard [x] happens in it and that kind of turned me off because [it seemed sketchy / it makes me sad when things like that happen / etc]. Was what I heard true? What did you think about that part?"
And then I let them respond.
(no subject)
Date: 10 Oct 2019 02:08 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Oct 2019 06:57 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Oct 2019 11:07 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Oct 2019 04:42 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Oct 2019 06:56 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 10 Oct 2019 07:10 pm (UTC)I still wonder what Black Klingon guy was expected. I mean, did he think Worf was going to say "jive turkey" a lot?
(no subject)
Date: 15 Oct 2019 08:05 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 15 Oct 2019 08:37 pm (UTC)