baffling mysteries
19 Feb 2005 07:07 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
1. why is wax suddenly downloading medical investigation again?
2. why isn't the fry/laurie jeeves & wooster more popular?
3. why is peter wingfield NEVER just dressed in a t-shirt on screen? i remember big t-shirts being fairly standard dress in the 90's.
4. why do the producers of all the csis constantly put beautiful women in quantities of makeup great enough to actually interfere with their attractiveness?
eta: why are even (especially?) people of excellent good taste occasionally prey to the charms of purple prose?sea-glass eyes? i'm terrified i'm actually going to use that now.
2. why isn't the fry/laurie jeeves & wooster more popular?
3. why is peter wingfield NEVER just dressed in a t-shirt on screen? i remember big t-shirts being fairly standard dress in the 90's.
4. why do the producers of all the csis constantly put beautiful women in quantities of makeup great enough to actually interfere with their attractiveness?
eta: why are even (especially?) people of excellent good taste occasionally prey to the charms of purple prose?
(no subject)
Date: 19 Feb 2005 07:42 pm (UTC)Just a t-shirt?! Works for me!
(no subject)
Date: 19 Feb 2005 10:34 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 19 Feb 2005 09:26 pm (UTC)I love it dearly, but even I found it a little tiresome by mid-season three. I think being crammed into an hour-long show each time hurts the stories; some of them need less time and some need more, but they all get inflated, conflated or deflated to fit the time-box of television. So, some of the episodes feel blown-out, empty and weightless, and some feel cramped, heavy and exhausting. Laurie and Fry are always irresistable, but when the pacing is too frenetic or too slow, the episode as a whole suffers, regardless of their charms. Also, it's bit repetitive. The fourth time Bertie has to steal something or face engagement to Random Society Shrew, you can't help starting to yawn a little.
(no subject)
Date: 19 Feb 2005 10:34 pm (UTC)...in written canon i don't get bored the fourth time he's in any given situation, or even the tenth; but that may be where the narrative voice really comes in.
(no subject)
Date: 20 Feb 2005 01:18 am (UTC)in written canon i don't get bored the fourth time he's in any given situation, or even the tenth; but that may be where the narrative voice really comes in.
I think that's probably true.
(no subject)
Date: 20 Feb 2005 02:23 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 20 Feb 2005 07:30 am (UTC)(Randomly reading your journal after reading your recs page--thanks for reccing my R&G stories, btw. And for banning those intro posts.)
(no subject)
Date: 20 Feb 2005 10:53 am (UTC)i seem to have earned a lot of good karma with that.
(no subject)
Date: 23 Feb 2005 09:23 pm (UTC)I will note that the series sets have never gone out of print (or whatever one calls tapes-n-disks) in the US and the UK, which is no small feat.
(no subject)
Date: 23 Feb 2005 09:35 pm (UTC)WHAT? omg, a world of know. i shudder to think of seeing it.
even though i was totally going to write a shipwrecked jeeves & wooster slash story myself.i didn't know that they'd never been out of whatever, either. i just. i mean, i've only seen them in the bbc and public television catalogs. not even on tv, or in the public library. :sigh:
(no subject)
Date: 25 Feb 2005 07:07 pm (UTC)You can see an icon of drag!Jeeves here. If you dare.
http://www.journalfen.net/users/phosfate/63677.html
(no subject)
Date: 25 Feb 2005 08:08 pm (UTC)someday.
omg drag!jeeves is really disturbing. i don't like him at all.
(no subject)
Date: 25 Feb 2005 08:14 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25 Feb 2005 09:25 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25 Feb 2005 09:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 25 Feb 2005 09:34 pm (UTC)fandom wars take on a new level of scary.
(no subject)
Date: 23 Feb 2005 09:36 pm (UTC)i really don't know what makes me do that...
(no subject)
Date: 25 Feb 2005 07:08 pm (UTC)