plebefic headers do a body good

[cimorene]

1. A/N: Also, I promise this is the last time I go in blind, next time I fully intend to find a beta, so my bad grammar doesn't kill you.
   
2. 
   Summary: Dean knew that she was a poor substitute for the being of love that he truly desired. He also knew that he could never be a proper substitute for the same creature when it came to him with an impossible offer of redemption and amnesia. Dean/Castiel. [Wait... what?]
   
3. 
   Title: Dolls in the Hands of a Cranky Fangirl
   Pairing: J2 (and my first one at that).
   Rating: PG-13 (thought mostly for language)
   Plot: Toy Story meets J2 meets a big old ball of crack, definitely an AU
   Warnings: J2 are dolls in this story and there are original characters The Art is by [redacted]
   
4. 
   Warnings: Nothing really, except for some use silliness and maybe some out of character… and maybe some bad grammar and misspelling.
   
5. 
   SUMMARY: (( “Jin, How long will your love for me last?” “I will love you for as long as this rose will never wither.” But then, a crazy thing happened))'
   

♥ to mah Aes for 4-5

Comments

[telesilla]

The "being of love?" Not that the rest of the summary is any better, but still....

[cimorene]

I keep getting stuck there before I get to the rest and realise the sentence fails in like 6 different ways.

[brownbetty]

Yes, that. I like how it doesn't make sense from any angle at all.

[mecurtin]

Nothing really, except for some use silliness and maybe some out of character… and maybe some bad grammar and misspelling.

Well that's OK then! *headdesk*

[jeeps]

i would totes read toy story!j2.

[cimorene]

If you're serious, you can always go to delicious.com and enter the title in the searchbox.

[jeeps]

well. :)) i don't trust that story especially, but it did make me think that done right, it could be hilarious.

[everysecondtuesday]

definitely an AU
I like that this accidentally implies that maybe there might possibly be a J2 Toy Story fic that is somehow mistaken for canon.

[cimorene]

Yeah, just like the ones that say in the disclaimer that they don't "necessarily" imply anything about the real actors' sexuality. IE, they totally do about SOME of them!